Cases 31 - 40 of 179
Terron Dizzley v. Michael Stephon
as 21-7258
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRON GERHARD DIZZLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL STEPHON, Warden, BRYAN STERLING, Director of SCDC, THORNTON, Nurse and others
Wise v. Inmate Grievance Coordinator Solomon et al
as 6:2021cv02308
Plaintiff:
Cederick Wise
Defendant:
Inmate Grievance Coordinator Solomon, Warden Nelson, Arthur Frederick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gabriel v. Hogan et al
as 1:2021cv01570
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Larry Hogan, Boyd K. Rutherford and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Gabriel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Thomas Moyler, Jr. v. D. Williams
as 21-6939
Defendant:
HAROLD CLARKE, SERGEANT J. R. MASSINGILL, MELISSA WELCH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER D. WILLIAMS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS MOYLER, JR.
Rochester v. Bryant et al
as 6:2021cv01880
Defendant:
K Bryant, B Stirling, Food Services Staff and others
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jack Vigue v. Harold Clarke
as 21-6907
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD H. PENCE, Counselor, MAILROOM SUPERVISOR, GRIEVANCE COORDINATOR and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACK RAY VIGUE
David Meyers v. D. Roundtree
as 21-6723
Defendant / Appellee:
MARTIN BRYANT, Warden, FISCAL TECH KRUSE, A. BROWN, Intel Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. G. Kellett
as 21-6678
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES PARKS, Manager of Offender Management Services, VADOC, G. KELLETT, Unit Manager, G.E.O., DR. WILLIAMS, G.E.O., LVCC Eye Doctor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. Director of Action Alliance Commonwealth of VAPREA
as 21-6672
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER BROWN, SXI Intel Officer, PEODE, SX1 Physician, MAJOR RUFFIN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
David Meyers v. J. Brown
as 21-6669
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT DIAL, A. WELLINTON, UNIT MANAGER J. BROWN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
