Cases 31 - 40 of 63
Darriel Cobbs v. Michael McCall
as 10-6499
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARRIEL LEE COBBS
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL MCCALL, Warden of Perry Correctional Institution and HENRY D. MCMASTER, Attorney General for the State of South Carolina
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2010cv00307
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Payton v. McMaster et al
as 3:2009cv03132
Plaintiff:
David Payton
Defendant:
Henry D McMaster and Jon E Ozmint
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Ronnie Harris v. Michael McCall
as 09-8047
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONNIE HARRIS
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL MCCALL
Respondent - None:
HENRY D. MCMASTER
McGraw v. McCall et al
as 2:2009cv02787
Petitioner:
Kenneth D McGraw
Respondent:
Michael McCall and Henry D McMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Field et al v. McMaster et al
as 6:2009cv01949
Plaintiff:
Arthur M Field, Kathryn Taillon, T Bart Kelley and others
Defendant:
Henry D McMaster, William J Condon, Jr, Tommy Windsor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gay v. McMasters et al
as 3:2009cv01681
Petitioner:
Donald Gay
Respondent:
Henry D McMasters, Mark Sanford and Warden Padula
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
craigslist Inc v. McMaster et al
as 2:2009cv01308
Plaintiff:
craigslist Inc
Defendant:
Henry D McMaster, David Pascoe, Barbara R Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McMaster v. Jolly & Associates LLC et al
as 4:2009cv01001
Plaintiff:
Henry D McMaster, Henry D McMaster, Henry D McMaster and others
Defendant:
Jolly & Associates LLC and Steve Jolly
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harris v. McCall et al
as 3:2009cv00948
Petitioner:
Ronnie Harris
Respondent:
Michael McCall and Henry D McMaster
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
