Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2018cv00472
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Rowland v. Bledsoe et al
as 7:2018cv00391
Defendant:
Kiser, B. Witt, J. Artrip and others
Plaintiff:
Cordaro A. W. Rowland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. Mullins et al
as 2:2018cv00710
Plaintiff:
BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Defendant:
James L. Mullins and James Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eric DePaola v. Harold Clarke
as 17-7067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC JOSEPH DEPAOLA
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, A. DAVID ROBINSON, EARL BARKSDALE and others
Eric DePaola v. Harold Clarke
as 16-7360
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC JOSEPH DEPAOLA
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, DAVID ROBINSON, G. K. WASHINGTON and others
Gary Wall v. Jeffrey Artrip
as 16-7308
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY WALL
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY ARTRIP, Delta-Building Unit Manager, TORI RAIFORD, Counselor/Unit Manager, J. FANNIN, Lieutenant and others
John Donohue v. J. Lambert
as 16-6628
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN PATRICK DONOHUE
Defendant - Appellee:
LT. J. LAMBERT, LT. MCCOWAN, LT. LIEUTENANT PAYNE and others
Defendant:
LT. SERGEANT BLEVENS, WARDEN RANDALL C. MATHENA, C/O OFFICER BEVERLY and others
Mullins v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02551
Plaintiff:
Tammy L. Mullins
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kevin Snodgrass, Jr. v. Harold Clark
as 14-7671
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN SNODGRASS, JR.
Plaintiff:
UHURU SEKOU OBATAIYE-ALLAH
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARK, Director, DOC, GERALD K. WASHINGTON, Regional Director, R. MATHENA, Warden and others
John Donohue v. Randall Mathena
as 14-7283
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN PATRICK DONOHUE
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDALL C. MATHENA, Warden, C. ROSE, Correctional Officer, GEORGE M. HINKLE, Regional Administrator and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
