Cases 31 - 40 of 676
Ferguson v. Blackmon et al
as 7:2023cv00736
Plaintiff:
Lamont Ferguson
Defendant:
Lt. Blackmon, M.J. Gilcrest, Jason Rason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Pietras v. StageZero Life Sciences, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00706
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW PIETRAS
Defendant:
STAGEZERO LIFE SCIENCES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Wimer v. Unknown
as 3:2023cv00702
Petitioner:
Matthew Allan Wimer
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PIETRAS v. STAGEZERO LIFE SCIENCES, INC.
as 1:2023cv01450
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW PIETRAS
Defendant:
STAGEZERO LIFE SCIENCES, INC.
Caldwell v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 7:2023cv00697
Plaintiff:
Matthew Gavin Caldwell
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Ervin Graves Strategy Group, LLC v. Feikes et al
as 1:2023cv01395
Plaintiff:
Ervin Graves Strategy Group, LLC
Defendant:
Allison Feikes, Matthew Salmon, Frederick C. LeVinus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Hedlund v. Mulheim et al
as 3:2023cv00631
Plaintiff:
Mr. Ronald Hedlund and Ronald Hedlund
Defendant:
Matthew Mulheim, Clarke Mercer, Sandra Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Ivey v. Restrepo et al
as 1:2023cv01318
Plaintiff:
Clinton Matthew Ivey
Defendant:
L. I. Restrepo, A. Cordon, Majette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goldman v. Beals et al
as 3:2023cv00590
Plaintiff:
Paul Goldman
Defendant:
Susan Beals, John O'Bannon, Rosalyn Dance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
