Cases 31 - 40 of 124
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00215
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armonti v. Jamaludeen
as 2:2020cv00216
Defendant:
Abdul Jamaludeen
Plaintiff:
Montcler Paris Armonti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armonti v. Stolle et al
as 2:2020cv00169
Defendant:
Kenneth Stolle, Mrs. Parris and Mr. Wels
Plaintiff:
Montcler Paris Armonti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armonti v. Padrick et al
as 2:2020cv00170
Defendant:
Kenneth Stolle, Colin D. Stolle and Padrick
Plaintiff:
Montcler Paris Armonti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lakiesha Cross v. Formativ Health Management
as 20-1263
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAKIESHA CROSS, FRANCESCO WEST, PARIS TAYLOR, as parent and natural guardian of C.P., Jr. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ETRANSMEDIA TECHNOLOGY, INC. and FORMATIV HEALTH MANAGEMENT, INC.
Andrew High v. Murphy-Brown, LLC
as 20-1150
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HATTIE TUCKER, RAQUAN SCARBOROUGH, LILLIE WAYMON and others
Plaintiff:
ALBERTA BATTS, SETH WALSTON, JR., DON WEBB and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MURPHY-BROWN, LLC
Armonti v. Roys
as 2:2019cv00495
Plaintiff:
Montcier P. Armonti and Montcler Paris Armonti
Defendant:
Elizabeth Anne Roys
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armonti v. Padrsek et al
as 2:2019cv00450
Defendant:
Sara Chandler and Padrsek
Plaintiff:
Montcier P. Armonti and Montcler Paris Armonti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armonti v. Stolle et al
as 2:2019cv00438
Defendant:
Colin D. Stolle, Hon. Glenn R. Crashaw and Sara Chandler, Esq.
Plaintiff:
Montcier Paris Armonti and Montcler Paris Armonti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armonti v. Naphcare Management et al
as 2:2019cv00420
Defendant:
Dr. Abdul H. Jamaludeen, Ms. Parris, Ms. Lizzel and others
Plaintiff:
Montcier Paris Armonti and Montcler Paris Armonti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
