Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 568,657
Barnes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv01113
Plaintiff: Michael J. Barnes
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Ra v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00406
Plaintiff: Ashan Ra
Defendant: David E. Anderson, Lt. J.B. Robinson, Lt. R. Hickman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrett v. Steven et al
as 7:2024cv00407
Plaintiff: Chad Allen Garrett
Defendant: Capt. Steven and Major or Lt. Gollet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turkette v. Maridor, LLC
as 7:2024cv00408
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Turkette
Defendant: Maridor, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Erie Insurance Company v. Northern Greenbrier Sprinkler Company, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00065
Plaintiff: Erie Insurance Company
Defendant: Northern Greenbrier Sprinkler Company, LLC and Advanced Engineering Consultants, LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Tripp v. Wheeling Hospital, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00121
Plaintiff: Wendy Tripp
Defendant: Wheeling Hospital, Inc. doing business as Wheeling Hospital
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Wells v. Charleston Area Medical Center - General
as 2:2024cv00317
Plaintiff: Kandance Wells
Defendant: Charleston Area Medical Center - General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Paulk v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00316
Petitioner: Mickey Paulk
Respondent: Warden W. Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Adams v. Dodrill et al
as 2:2024cv00315
Plaintiff: Keith Deshon Adams
Defendant: Oak Hill Police Offi Brandon Dodrill and Oak Hill Police Offi Tyler Hogan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rivera v. Warden Kenneth Nelson
as 8:2023cv04801
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?