Cases 41 - 50 of 578
Hong v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2008cv03034
Plaintiff:
Hangqing Hong
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Jonathan Scharfen and F. Gerard Heinauer
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2008cv02996
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Gonzalez v. Toney et al
as 1:2008cv01166
Petitioner:
Jose Fernandez Gonzalez
Respondent:
Earnest Toney, Mary Loiselle, John P. Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Phillippe v. Willett et al
as 1:2008cv01167
Petitioner:
James Saint Phillippe
Respondent:
J. C. Willett, Deborah Achim, James T. Hayes, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2008cv02943
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2008cv02697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Lawrence Wilder, Sr. v. Michael Chertoff
as 08-2164
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, Secretary of United States Department of Homeland Security and WILLIAM BOULDIN, Chief Administrative Law Judge, United States Merit Systems Protection Board, Northeastern Regional Office, in his offical Federal Governmental capacity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Ilkhan v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2008cv01111
Plaintiff:
Esfandiar Ilkhan
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Michael Mukasey, Jonathan Scharfen and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jin v. Chertoff et al
as 8:2008cv02806
Plaintiff:
Ying Jin
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Jonathan Scharfen and Evelyn Upchurch
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
