Cases 41 - 50 of 320
Armistead v. Hooks
as 5:2021hc02204
Petitioner:
James Gregory Armistead
Respondent:
Erik A. Hooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown-Bey v. State of North Carolina et al
as 1:2021cv00247
Petitioner:
Eddricco L. Brown-Bey
Respondent:
North Carolina, State of, Milton Oliver Fletcher, North Carolina Division of Adult Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BATTLE v. FORDHAM et al
as 1:2021cv00692
Plaintiff:
KENNETH A. BATTLE
Defendant:
MERCEDES T. FORDHAM, JOSHUA C. DENNIS, SERGEANT WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Means v. Higdon et al
as 5:2021ct03267
Plaintiff:
Charles Antonio Means
Defendant:
Bobby Higdon, Josh Stein, Stanley L. Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brandon Lee v. Erik Hooks
as 21-7180
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRANDON JAMES LEE
Respondent / Appellee:
ERIK A. HOOKS, Secretary, NC Department of Public Safety and DENISE JACKSON, Warden, Central Prison
Jonathan Newell v. North Carolina Industrial Commission
as 21-7094
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN JAMES NEWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
NORTH CAROLINA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, PHILIP A. BADDOUR, JR., KIMBERLY D. GRANDE and others
Devontay Myles v. Department of Public Safety
as 21-7060
Petitioner / Appellant:
DEVONTAY D. MYLES
Respondent / Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, ROY COOPER, SARAH LIAGUNO and others
Meyers v. Boxer et al
as 5:2021ct03211
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Captain Boxer, Lt. Mosley, A. David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tariq Everette v. Sean Dillard
as 21-7010
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TARIQ EVERETTE, a/k/a Tariq Elijah Everette El
Defendant / Appellee:
SEAN T. DILLARD, Warden, TODD E. ISHEE, Director and ERIK A. HOOKS, Secretary of NC Department of Public Safety
JAMES-EL v. HOOKS et al
as 1:2021cv00487
Defendant:
C. STARLING, MACRE R. CRIDER, MONICA BOND and others
Plaintiff:
HARRY SHAROD JAMES-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
