Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Lanier v. First Citizens Bank & Trust Company et al
as 4:2010cv00073
Plaintiff:
Dallas B Lanier
Defendant:
First Citizens Bank & Trust Company and Bank Of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Salmons, Inc. v. First Citizens Bank & Trust Company
as 2:2010cv00072
Plaintiff:
Salmons, Inc.
Defendant:
First Citizens Bank & Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company v. Dalporto
as 5:2009cv00365
Plaintiff:
First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company
Defendant:
Sandro Dalporto and X Digital Media, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Rainsdon v. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company
as 2:2009mc00002
Plaintiff:
Gary L. Rainsdon
Defendant:
First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company
First Citizens Bank & Trust Company v. Black et al
as 5:2009cv00081
Plaintiff:
First Citizens Bank & Trust Company
Defendant:
Ray Cooper Black and Robert S. Jolly
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-1824
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv00492
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 07-2105
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Supporting Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Austin v. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company et al
as 4:2007cv00088
Plaintiff:
Carolyn T. Austin
Defendant:
First-Citizens Bank & Trust Company and Maureen Goode
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
