Cases 41 - 50 of 65
Gary Wall v. David Robinson
as 12-7589
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY WALL
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID ROBINSON, Regional Director of the VA. D.O.C., KELLY, Chief Warden of SX-I SP, EVERETT, Chief Warden of SX-II SP and others
Kinard v. Beamon, et al
as 2:2012cv00488
Plaintiff:
Jordan J. Kinard
Defendant:
Mr. Beamon, Ms. Kelly, Mr. Woodson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kinard v. Kelly et al
as 2:2012cv00489
Plaintiff:
Jordan Joseph Kinard
Defendant:
L. Kelly, J. Woodson, A. Fowlkes-Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Sean Fowlke
as 12-6981
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SEAN DARNELL FOWLKES
Lord Versatile v. Loretta Kelly
as 12-6858
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LORD VERSATILE, a/k/a Venson Leon Coward
Defendant - Appellee:
LORETTA KELLY, Warden, Sussex I State Prison, A. F. MILLER, Operations Officer, Sussex I State Prison, L. RODRIGUES, Correctional Officer Sgt., Sussex I State Prison and others
Defendant:
D. HUDSON, Grievance Coordinator, Sussex I State Prison, SHARON S. BURGESS, Regional Office Appeals Manager, MELISSA WELCH, Offender Discipline Unit Manager and others
Versatile v. Kelly et al
as 3:2012cv00332
Plaintiff:
Lord Versatile
Defendant:
Loretta Kelly, A. David Robinson and T. Fowlkes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Sean Fowlke
as 11-5102
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SEAN DARNELL FOWLKES
Lopez v. Clarke et al
as 1:2011cv00926
Plaintiff:
Jose Lopez
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, A. David Robinson, Loretta K. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Tucker et al
as 2:2011cv00339
Plaintiff:
Kevin A. Watson
Defendant:
J. Tucker, W. Campbell, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Clark et al
as 8:2011cv01488
Plaintiff:
Titus Thomas
Defendant:
K. Clark, Fowlkes, Bisara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
