Cases 41 - 50 of 1,901
Anderson v. Seville
as 7:2024cv00017
Petitioner:
William Lee Anderson, II
Respondent:
Warden Mike Seville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Polidi v. Mendel et al
as 1:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Richard Polidi
Defendant:
Elizabeth U. Mendel, James O. Payne, Michelle K. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Whitaker v. Watson et al
as 2:2024cv00003
Defendant:
DR MARK M WHITAKER, Sheriff William Watson, Brett Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Dr. Mark M. Whitaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Lassiter v. Looney et al
as 2:2023cv00681
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Lassiter, Jr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Looney, LT. Fleming, Irving and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stallings v. USA
as 6:2023cv81545
Petitioner:
Justin Lee Stallings
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lee v. USA
as 3:2023cv00857
Petitioner:
Titus Lee
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Evans v. Commonwealth Attorney
as 1:2023cv01694
Plaintiff:
George Lee Evans, Jr.
Defendant:
Commonwealth Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Starks, Jr. v. Clarke et al
as 2:2023cv00633
Plaintiff:
Bernard Lee Starks, Jr.
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Kevin McCoy, A. Wethington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rimmer v. Schneider et al
as 7:2023cv00781
Plaintiff:
Gary Lee Rimmer
Defendant:
Michael Schneider, Hally Vradenburgh, Esq. and T. Brotta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacques v. Staff Members at U.S.P. Lee et al
as 7:2023cv00769
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jacques
Defendant:
Staff Members at U.S.P. Lee, A.W. Waughan, Lt. D. Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
