Cases 41 - 50 of 4,759
George v. O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv02537
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Samantha George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Blackstone v. O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 8:2024cv02539
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Blackstone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Blackburn-Hoelscher v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv00836
Plaintiff:
Stacy A. Blackburn-Hoelscher
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Shaw v. Mitchell County et al
as 3:2024cv00800
Defendant:
Sidney Marie Britt, Wanda Earp, Erica Turner Crump and others
Plaintiff:
Sandy Martin Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Shaw v. Mitchell County et al
as 1:2024cv00226
Defendant:
John Does, Terry L. Silvers, Stacey Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
Sandy Martin Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. O' Malley
as 1:2024cv02528
Plaintiff:
Blair Evan White
Defendant:
Martin O' Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Martin v. O'Malley
as 8:2024cv02524
Plaintiff:
Damone Martin
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Pate v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00498
Plaintiff:
Carly Pate
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Auriemma v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Francis Auriemma
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Watkins v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv02410
Defendant:
Martin, Ogwanabi, Laiser and others
Plaintiff:
Elia T. Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
