Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 63
Kingvision Pay Per View, Ltd. v. Islander 1928, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv00354
Plaintiff: Kingvision Pay Per View, Ltd.
Defendant: Islander 1928, LLC and Alexander M. Watt, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
KingVision Pay Per View, Ltd. v. Ribadeneira et al
as 1:2010cv00356
Plaintiff: KingVision Pay Per View, Ltd.
Defendant: Jose E. Ribadeneira and Jose E. Ribadeneira
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
KingVision Pay Per View, Ltd. v. The Mason Group, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv00355
Plaintiff: KingVision Pay Per View, Ltd.
Defendant: The Mason Group, LLC and Doni Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lamb v. Nextel Communications of the Mid-Atlantic, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv00149
Plaintiff: Edward Lamb and Edward Lamb
Defendant: Nextel Communications of the Mid-Atlantic, Inc., Nextel Communications of the Mid-Atlantic, Inc., Nextel Communications, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Type: Labor Plaintiff
Reynolds Foil Inc. v. Pai We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00657
Plaintiff: Reynolds Foil Inc.
Defendant: Shwetha Pai
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract None
Michael Ray v. Evercom Systems, Incorporated We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-7753
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL R. RAY, on behalf of himself personally and as initial class representative pending the appointment of counsel to represent the class
Defendant - Appellee: EVERCOM SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, LEXINGTON COUNTY, on behalf of Lexington County Detention Center, PAY TEL COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED and others
Defendant - None: DARLINGTON COUNTY, on behalf of Darlington County Detention Center, DILLON COUNTY, on behalf of Dillon County Detention Center, SPARTANBURG COUNTY, on behalf of Spartanburg County Detention Center and others
Robert Fernicola v. GPO Federal Credit Union
as 09-1833
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROBERT E. FERNICOLA, as legal owners of certain bonds, accounts, trust, delegation investment management agreements designated as treasury tax and loan depositaries and federal tax depositaries that are approved paying agent and DONNA J. FERNICOLA, as legal owners of certain bonds, accounts, trust, delegation investment management agreements designated as treasury tax and loan depositaries and federal tax depositaries that are approved paying agent
Defendant - Appellee: GPO FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, BANK OF AMERICA, GPO FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, CEO John Prumo, VP Gary Roback, GOP Branch Manager Sherry Morasco and others
Jasmin v. DFAS Clevland/US Govt Pay Office
as 6:2009cv00023
Plaintiff: Richard J. Jasmin
Defendant: DFAS Clevland/US Govt Pay Office
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Robert Fernicola v. GPO Federal Credit Union
as 09-1132
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROBERT E. FERNICOLA, as legal owners of certain bonds, accounts, trust, delegation investment management agreements designated as treasury tax and loan depositaries and federal tax depositaries that are approved paying agent and DONNA J. FERNICOLA, as legal owners of certain bonds, accounts, trust, delegation investment management agreements designated as treasury tax and loan depositaries and federal tax depositaries that are approved paying agent
Defendant - Appellee: GPO FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, BANK OF AMERICA, GPO FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, CEO John Prumo, VP Gary Roback, GOP Branch Manager Sherry Morasco and others
Dean Vaughan v. Celanese Americas Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-2064
Plaintiff - Appellant: DEAN A. VAUGHAN, MICHAEL GRUENDER, JERRY DEAN BAKER and others
Defendant - Appellee: CELANESE AMERICAS CORPORATION, CELANESE ADVANCED MATERIALS, INCORPORATED and THE CELANESE AMERICAS CORPORATION SEPARATION PAY PLAN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?