Cases 41 - 50 of 94
Taylor Quinn v. Christopher Zerkle
as 22-2187
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAYLOR QUINN
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT CHRISTOPHER K. ZERKLE, SERGEANT PAXTON LIVELY, SERGEANT RICK KEGLOR and others
Mark Toon v. Christopher Zerkle
as 22-2188
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK TOON, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Eric Toon
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT CHRISTOPHER K. ZERKLE, West Virginia State Police, in his individual and official capacity, SERGEANT PAXTON LIVELY, Kanawha County Sheriff, in his individual and official capacity, SERGEANT RICK KEGLOR, Kanawha County Sheriff, in his individual and official capacity and others
Paxton v. Staff
as 3:2022cv00550
Plaintiff:
Jamar Paxton
Defendant:
Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jamar Paxton, Jr. v. Richmond City Justice Center
as 22-6800
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMAR PAXTON, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHMOND CITY JUSTICE CENTER
Jamar Paxton, Jr. v. Richmond City Justice Center
as 22-6788
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMAR PAXTON, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHMOND CITY JUSTICE CENTER
Jamar Paxton, Jr. v. Richmond City Justice Center
as 22-6797
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMAR PAXTON, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHMOND CITY JUSTICE CENTER, Staff
Paxton v. Richmond City Justice Center Staff
as 3:2022cv00408
Plaintiff:
Jamar Paxton
Defendant:
Richmond City Justice Center Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paxton v. Richmond City Justice Center
as 3:2022cv00358
Plaintiff:
Jamar Paxton
Defendant:
Richmond City Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paxton v. Richmond City Justice Center
as 3:2022cv00277
Plaintiff:
Jamar Paxton, Jr.
Defendant:
Richmond City Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paxton v. RCJC Staff
as 3:2022cv00275
Plaintiff:
Jamar Paxton, Jr.
Defendant:
RCJC Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
