Cases 41 - 50 of 85
Hawkins v. Mathena et al
as 7:2012cv00095
Defendant:
Mr. Ronnie Brock, Corizon Health Service, Inc, Ms. Kilgore and others
Plaintiff:
Lyndrell Demond Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Virginia Department Of Corrections et al
as 7:2012cv00069
Respondent:
Harold Clark, John S. Garman, R. C. Mathena and others
Petitioner:
Deonta Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eleazar Totten v. R. Mathena
as 11-7475
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELEAZAR TOTTEN
Defendant - Appellee:
R. C. MATHENA, Chief Warden
Onwuka v. Keen Mountain Correctional Center et al
as 7:2011cv00485
Defendant:
Keen Mountain Correctional Center, R. C. Mathena and Unknown Dog Handlers
Plaintiff:
John Onwuka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strebe v. Mathena et al
as 7:2011cv00469
Defendant:
T. Flanary, Lt. Kilbourne and R. C. Mathena
Plaintiff:
Brian David Strebe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Theotis Johnson v. John Jabe
as 11-6887
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THEOTIS MARQUETTE JOHNSON, a/k/a Prince Justice Foundat Allah
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN JABE, Deputy Director of Virginia Department of Corrections, LARRY HUFFMAN, KATHLEEN BASSETT and others
Defendant:
K. PRICE
Totten v. Mathena
as 1:2011cv00746
Plaintiff:
Eleazar Totten
Defendant:
R. C. Mathena
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT v. HUNTER
as 1:2011mc00036
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Defendant:
R. C. HUNTER
Titus Thomas v. G. L. Wilson
as 11-6599
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TITUS THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
G. WILSON, D. KRAMPT, R. C. ALLISON and others
Party-in-Interest:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-1404
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
