Cases 41 - 50 of 369
Banks III v. Talbot County State Attorney et al
as 1:2022cv00198
Plaintiff:
Raymond Banks III
Defendant:
Talbot County State Attorney, Maryland State Police Easton Barracks, Talbot County State's Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mercer v. Amalgamated Transit Union Division 689 et al
as 8:2021cv03274
Plaintiff:
Linda Mercer
Defendant:
Amalgamated Transit Union Division 689, Amalgamated Transit Union, Raymond Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03130
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Raymond James & Associates, Inc. v. Martin
as 1:2021cv03096
Plaintiff:
Raymond James & Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Sean Rierson Martin
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03051
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Aigbekaen v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv02890
Plaintiff:
Raymond Idemudia Aigbekaen
Defendant:
United States of America
Simms-Lewis v. Baltimore City Booking Intake Center et al
as 1:2021cv02831
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Simms-Lewis
Defendant:
Baltimore City Booking Intake Center, Warden Obello, Governor Larry Hogan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Simms-Lewis v. Obello et al
as 1:2021cv02829
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Simms-Lewis
Defendant:
Warden Obello, BCBIC Medical Department Supervisor, Medstar Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Simms-Lewis v. Tee et al
as 1:2021cv02830
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Simms-Lewis
Defendant:
Officer Ms. Tee, Warden Obello, Governor Larry Hogan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Gill v. USA 2255
as 1:2021cv02731
Plaintiff:
Raymond Edward Gill
Defendant:
USA 2255
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1225
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
