Cases 41 - 49 of 49
KELLY v. VAUGHN et al
as 1:2007cv00329
Plaintiff:
WILLIE THOMAS KELLY, JR.
Defendant:
VAUGHN, ROSEMARY DAVIDSON, HARRY ALEXANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Coffey et al
as 7:2007cv00063
Plaintiff:
Michael S Adams
Defendant:
M. Terry Coffey, Jeff D. Etheridge, Jr., Charles D. Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2007cv00064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Adams v. Coffey et al
as 7:2007cv00060
Plaintiff:
Michael S Adams
Defendant:
M. Terry Coffey, Jeff D. Etheridge, Jr., Charles D. Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Adams v. Coffey et al
as 7:2007cv00059
Plaintiff:
Michael S Adams
Defendant:
M. Terry Coffey, Jeff D Etheridge, Charles D. Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv00050
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00025
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
RAHIMI v. Chertoff et al
as 5:2007cv00049
Plaintiff:
Khalil RAHIMI
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzalez, Rosemary Langley Melville and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
RAHIMI v. Chertoff et al
as 4:2007cv00022
Plaintiff:
Khalil RAHIMI
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzalez, Rosemary Langley Melville and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
