Cases 41 - 50 of 73
Stiles et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2013cv20273
Plaintiff:
Patsy J. Stiles and Alfred Stiles
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stiles v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv16839
Plaintiff:
Tamara Stiles
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stiles v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv16898
Plaintiff:
Barbara Stiles
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
James McClelland v. Randy Teague
as 13-6884
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES FRANKLIN MCCLELLAND
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY TEAGUE, Superintendent Marion Correctional Center, KEITH TURNER, Unit Manager Marion Correctional Center, J. STILES, Correctional Officer Marion Correctional Center and others
James McClelland v. Randy Teague
as 13-6884
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES FRANKLIN MCCLELLAND
Defendant / Appellee:
RANDY TEAGUE, Superintendent Marion Correctional Center, KEITH TURNER, Unit Manager Marion Correctional Center, J. STILES, Correctional Officer Marion Correctional Center and others
Stiles et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv13132
Plaintiff:
Allyson E. Stiles and William F. Stiles
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stiles v. Keener
as 1:2013cv00116
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Stiles, Jr.
Defendant:
Larry Keener
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Stiles v. Schick et al
as 1:2013de00103
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Stiles, Jr.
Defendant:
Jim Schick and John Briadshaw
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Stiles v. Marsh et al
as 1:2013de00086
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Stiles, Jr.
Defendant:
James Marsh and Bobby Suttles
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Stiles v. Askew
as 1:2013de00074
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Stiles, Jr.
Defendant:
Wade Askew
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
