Cases 51 - 60 of 143
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1987
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bowers et al v. Citibank, N.A. et al
as 3:2017cv00462
Plaintiff:
William Bowers and Tracy Bowers
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A. and AllianceOne Receivables Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02212
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hoang et al v. Citibank N.A. et al
as 8:2017cv01909
Plaintiff:
Minh Vu Hoang and Thanh Hoang
Defendant:
Citibank N.A., Fay Servicing, LLC and Cindy R. Diamond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Randall Patrick v. Citibank, N.A.
as 17-1663
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDALL PATRICK
Defendant - Appellee:
CITIBANK, N.A.
George Jackson v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 17-1627
Third Party Plaintiff - Appellee:
GEORGE W. JACKSON
Defendant:
CAROLINA WATER SYSTEMS, INC. and CITIBANK, N.A.
Third Party Defendant - Appellant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INCORPORATED
Citibank, N.A., As Trustee for American Home Mortgage Investment Trust 2004-3 v. Berliner et al
as 1:2017cv01172
Plaintiff:
Citibank, N.A., As Trustee for American Home Mortgage Investment Trust 2004-3
Defendant:
Howard Berliner, Deborah Keehner Griffitts, John Keehner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PATRICK v. CITIBANK, N.A.
as 1:2017cv00218
Plaintiff:
RANDALL PATRICK
Defendant:
CITIBANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Citibank, N.A. v. Jackson
as 3:2016cv00712
Thirdparty_defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and Carolina Water Systems, Inc.
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
George W. Jackson
Counter_claimant:
George W. Jackson
Counter_defendant:
Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Hinson, Trustee v. Citi Bank, N. A.
as 5:2016cv00767
Plaintiff:
Walter L Hinson, Trustee
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
