Cases 51 - 60 of 386
Meyers v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00347
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Meyers v. Warden et al
as 7:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Warden, Harold Clarke and Kyle Rosch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. USA
as 3:2023cv00373
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Meyers v. Migos-Migos et al
as 5:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Christina Migos-Migos, Bradeshawn Harris, Publications Review Committee of NCDPS-NCDAC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Baucom et al
as 5:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Emily Baucom and North Carolina Industrial Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Marshall et al
as 5:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
FNU Marshall, FNU Cox, FNU LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Duncan et al
as 5:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Jeffrey P. Duncan, FNU Freeman, Joshua Sigmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Alexander Correctional Institute Wardens et al
as 5:2023cv00081
Petitioner:
David Meyers
Respondent:
Alexander Correctional Institute Wardens and Peter Bucholtz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Meyers v. Interstate Compact Administrator et al
as 5:2023ct03170
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Interstate Compact Administrator, Extradiction Officer Manager and Secretary Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. Harold Clarke
as 23-6524
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director Virginia Department of Corrections and KYLE ROSCH, Interstate Compact Administrator
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
