Cases 51 - 60 of 121
US v. John Haye
as 16-4235
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN EDWARD HAYES
Butler v. McCrory
as 5:2015ct03340
Plaintiff:
John Edward Butler
Defendant:
Pat McCrory and State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Anderson, Jr. v. Portsmouth City
as 15-7639
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN EDWARD ANDERSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PORTSMOUTH, WILLIAM WATSON, LIEUTENANT KEESE, Acting subordinate of the Sheriff and others
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, PORTSMOUTH CITY JAIL, AMY KIRBY, Public Defender and others
Butler v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2015ct03239
Plaintiff:
John Edward Butler
Defendant:
State of North Carolina and Pat McCrory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Daniels
as 5:2015hc02175
Petitioner:
John Edward Butler
Respondent:
Dennis Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
John Kuplen v. Frank Perry
as 15-7218
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN EDWARD KUPLEN
Respondent - Appellee:
FRANK PERRY
Regina Hunter v. Nikki Haley
as 15-244
Petitioner:
REGINA M. HUNTER
Respondent:
THE HONORABLE NIKKI R. HALEY, Governor, State of South Carolina Government, MR. GARY A. MIXON, Administrator, Sumter County South Carolina Government, MRS. NAOMI D. SANDERS, Chairman D-1, Sumter County South Carolina Government and others
Regina Hunter v. Nikki Haley
as 15-1620
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINA M. HUNTER
Defendant - Appellee:
THE HONORABLE NIKKI R. HALEY, Governor, State of South Carolina Government, MR. GARY A. MIXON, Administrator, Sumter County South Carolina Government, MRS. NAOMI D. SANDERS, Chairman D-1, Sumter County South Carolina Government and others
John Butler v. Ernest Hedge
as 15-6828
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN EDWARD BUTLER
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER ERNEST HEDGES, Tampa Police Department, OFFICER PROUTY, Tampa Police Department, DETECTIVE WHITE, Tampa Police Department and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
