Cases 61 - 70 of 94
Perez v. Wah Feng, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv01667
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Wah Feng, LLC and Jin Cai Shi
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. Marana Corporation et al
as 7:2014cv04669
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Defendant:
Marana Corporation , El Mexicano II Inc , El Mexicano Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Stine v. Covahey, Boozer, Devan & Dore et al
as 1:2014cv03785
Plaintiff:
Richard Eugene Stine
Defendant:
Covahey, Boozer, Devan & Dore, John Sica, P.A., M & T Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perez v. Bronco Mexican Restaurant No 1 Inc et al
as 7:2014cv04586
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Defendant:
Bronco Mexican Restaurant No 1 Inc , Bronco Mexican Restaurant No 2 Inc , Bronco Mexican Restaurant No 3 Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. Sanchez et al
as 6:2014cv04326
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Defendant:
Jose Jesus Sanchez, Ramon Vega, Rafael Arroyo and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
TAY v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2014cv00802
Plaintiff:
TAY
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, MARISSA PISARICK, RANDOLPH NAOMI and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Perez v. Southport Grill, Corp., d/b/a The Blue Marlin
as 7:2014mc00003
Petitioner:
Thomas E. Perez
Respondent:
Southport Grill, Corp., d/b/a The Blue Marlin
Perez v. Ridge et al
as 1:2014cv00964
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Gregory Ridge, Ridge & Long Limited Company and Ridge & Long Limited Company 401(K) Profit Sharing Plan & Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Perez v. JP Masonry, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00518
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
JP Masonry, Inc., Joshua O. Pacheco and Manuel Pacheco
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez et al v. Merryman Grounds Maintenance, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00093
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez and United States Department of Labor
Defendant:
Merryman Grounds Maintenance, Inc. and David Merryman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
