Cases 71 - 80 of 135
Pair v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2015cv00776
Plaintiff:
Larry Pair
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Waters et al
as 2:2015cv00282
Plaintiff:
Donald Wayne Waters
Defendant:
The Geo Group, Incorporated, Ed Wright, Daniel Calhoun, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Microsoft Corporation v. John Does 1, et al.
as 1:2015cv00240
Plaintiff:
Microsoft Corporation and FS-ISAC, Inc.
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and John Doe 3
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Dogs Deserve Better, Inc. et al v. Terry et al
as 3:2014cv00591
Plaintiff:
Dogs Deserve Better, Inc. and Tamira Thayne
Defendant:
Tracy Terry, Surry County, Surry County Board of Supervisors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CT #1 et al v. Moore et al
as 4:2014cv00106
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe #1 , Jane Doe #2 , John Doe #1 and others
Defendant:
Judson D. Moore , Newport News City Farm Adult Corrections and City of Newport News
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd v. Seven Corners, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00972
Plaintiff:
Grant Boyd
Defendant:
Seven Corners, Inc., John Doe (1), John Doe (2) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bey et al
as 3:2014cv00511
Plaintiff:
Akil R. Bey and Katina Bowers-Graves
Defendant:
Sharon Gregory Jacobs, Marilynn C. Goss, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wheeler v. 7-Eleven, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00082
Plaintiff:
Tonia A. Wheeler
Defendant:
7-Eleven, Inc. , 7-Eleven Stores, Inc. , 7-Eleven and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LordMaster v. Sussex II State Prison
as 1:2014cv00507
Plaintiff:
Frankie Jae LordMaster
Defendant:
Sussex II State Prison, Warden Vargo, J. Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wagner v. Miller et al.
as 2:2014cv00164
Plaintiff:
Donika Anderson Wagner
Defendant:
James D. Miller, Ph.D. , Bermina Nickerson, Ph.D. , Alpana Dave, RN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
