Cases filed in Virginia
Cases 71 - 80 of 188
Lickteig v. Orbital ATK, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01139
Defendant: Janice I. Obuchowski, Ronald R. Fogleman, Roman Martinez, IV and others
Plaintiff: Charles Lickteig
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Harrison & Bates, Incorporated v. Nexstar Media Group, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00654
Plaintiff: Harrison & Bates, Incorporated
Defendant: Nexstar Media Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harrison v. Harris Teeter, LLC
as 2:2017cv00490
Plaintiff: Denise Harrison
Defendant: Harris Teeter, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson et al v. City of Richmond, Virginia et al
as 3:2017cv00553
Plaintiff: Bravette Johnson and Curtis Williams
Defendant: City of Richmond, Virginia, Jason Norton, Bryan T. Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saunders-El et al v. Hehenberger et al
as 1:2017cv00879
Plaintiff: Antonio J Saunders-El
Defendant: John Doe , Jane and/or John Doe, John Doe Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gyamfi v. Jeffers et al
as 1:2017cv00757
Plaintiff: Kwame Gyamfi
Defendant: Diane Jeffers , Jane Mason and Sydney J. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Correct Care Solutions, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00586
Plaintiff: Gregory Perry
Defendant: Correct Care Solutions, LLC, Unknown Rogers, Unknown Tarasova and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00158
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00108
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 131
Ensley et al v. City of Richmond, Virginia et al
as 3:2017cv00024
Plaintiff: Wilber Ensley , Covey Andrews , Shamar Archer and others
Defendant: City of Richmond, Virginia , Jason Norton , Bryan T. Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?