Cases 71 - 80 of 197
Macedo-Flores v. Peters et al
as 3:2023cv00151
Plaintiff:
Austreberta Macedo-Flores
Defendant:
Colette Peters, Warden Lovett and All staff employees in their individual capacities working in receiving and distribution mailroom (R&D) on the Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ford v. Lovett
as 3:2023cv00137
Petitioner:
Samuel B. Ford
Respondent:
S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Reyes v. Lovett
as 5:2023cv00195
Petitioner:
Ricardo Reyes
Respondent:
Warden S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Chesser v. Lovett
as 3:2023cv00135
Petitioner:
Zachary Chesser
Respondent:
S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
v. Johnson et al
as 5:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Keith Dimitri Johnson
Defendant:
Mr. Merrick Garland, Mrs. C. S. Peters, Mr. C. Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Julio Solorzano v. Warden Lovett
as 23-6486
Petitioner / Appellant:
JULIO SOLORZANO
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN LOVETT
Dixon v. Lovett et al
as 5:2023cv00187
Petitioner:
Dante Dixon
Respondent:
S. Lovett, P. Boch, K. Bigart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
El-Amin v. Lovett et al
as 5:2023cv00180
Petitioner:
Sundiata El-Amin
Respondent:
S. Lovett, K. Bigart, P. Boch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. Lovett et al
as 5:2023cv00179
Petitioner:
Dwight Williams
Respondent:
S. Lovett, K. Bigart, W. Sines and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
GRAY v. LOVETTE
as 1:2023cv00352
Petitioner:
DQUAN D. GRAY
Defendant:
WARDEN LOVETTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
