Cases 81 - 90 of 159
Crispin v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, et al.
as 5:2011cv00375
Plaintiff:
Graham A. Crispin
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP , Bank of America, National Association and Substitute Trustee Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Miller v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP et al
as 3:2011cv00057
Plaintiff:
Gene A. Miller
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP and Bank of America, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gregory Beatty v. BAC Home Loans Servicing
as 11-1724
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY ALAN BEATTY
Defendant - Appellee:
BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, (Erin M. Brady, Esq.)
BRYSON v. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP, et al
as 1:2011cv00543
Plaintiff:
MONIQUE N. BRYSON
Defendant:
BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP and BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Elrod et al v. BAC Home Loan Servicing, LP
as 5:2011cv00343
Defendant:
BAC Home Loan Servicing, LP
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Elrod and Peggy P. Elrod
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Rowe v. Bank of America, NA
as 11-1643
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL G.D. ROWE
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, NA and BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00479
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Duvall v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 3:2011cv00046
Plaintiff:
Peggy D. Duvall
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. and BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sincere v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP et al
as 3:2011cv00038
Defendant:
ALG Trustee, L.L.C., BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Circuit Court of the City of Charlottesville
Plaintiff:
Richard Sincere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-1548
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
