Cases 81 - 90 of 709
Smith v. Kelly
as 5:2022hc02146
Petitioner:
Stephen Michael Smith
Respondent:
Warden L. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fritsch v. Trawler Carolina Lady, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00079
Plaintiff:
Stephen Ray Fritsch
Defendant:
Trawler Carolina Lady, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
STEPHENS v. LEAKE
as 1:2022cv00535
Plaintiff:
GEORGE C. STEPHENS and GEORGE CHRISTOPHER STEPHENS
Defendant:
OFFICER DAWN LEAKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mumena v. Decker et al
as 3:2022cv00268
Plaintiff:
Mumena Mushinge and Mushinge Mumena
Defendant:
Stephen Decker and Stone Creek Global, Ltd.
Weidner et al v. Adams et al
as 1:2022cv00121
Plaintiff:
Lynn K. Weidner, Stephen E. Weidner, Amanda K. Weidner and others
Defendant:
Melissa M. Adams and Ashley J. Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Hobart v. Praetorian Standard, Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv00232
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Hobart
Defendant:
Praetorian Standard, Inc., Richard L. Davis, Stephen Mackinnon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Stephen v. Baker et al
as 5:2022ct03161
Plaintiff:
Aaron Lance Stephen
Defendant:
Gerald Baker, Correctional Officer Santos, Correctional Officer Issac and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clervrain et al v. Tillis et al
as 1:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Manetiony Clervrain, Wesline Casir and others
Defendant:
Thom Tillis, Sydney Batch, Madison Cawthorn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tolbert v. King et al
as 3:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Shantal Tolbert
Defendant:
Willye Mai King, Richelieu Dennis, Yende Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Bannerman v. Rohm
as 7:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
Corbin A. Bannerman
Defendant:
Stephen Miller Rohm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
