Cases 81 - 90 of 121
Smith v. Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC et al
as 8:2022cv01336
Plaintiff:
Robinette Gravely Smith
Defendant:
Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC and Truist Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Fraud
Henderson v. Truist Bank et al
as 1:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
Kim F. Henderson
Defendant:
Truist Bank and Michael R. Cogan, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Power v. Truist Bank
as 6:2022cv00771
Defendant:
Truist Bank and Branch Banking and Trust Company
Plaintiff:
Jon D Power
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Lawrence and Louis Company D/B/A Hidden Oasis Salon v. Truist Bank
as 1:2022cv00200
Plaintiff:
Lawrence and Louis Company D/B/A Hidden Oasis Salon
Defendant:
Truist Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Wade et al v. Truist Bank et al
as 8:2022cv00287
Plaintiff:
Rossi Wade and Daughter (Jane Doe)
Defendant:
Truist Bank, Suntrust Bank and BB&T Merger, Suntrust "Truist" Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Kenneth Wallace v. Truist Bank
as 21-2380
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH WALLACE and DMT, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
TRUIST BANK
Defendant:
EDDIE R. HUGHES, JR.
Texas Star Nut and Food Co., Inc v. Truist Bank et al
as 8:2021cv02564
Plaintiff:
Texas Star Nut and Food Co., Inc
Defendant:
Truist Bank and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ironworks Development LLC v. Truist Bank
as 3:2021cv00032
Plaintiff:
Ironworks Development LLC
Defendant:
Truist Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. Truist Bank
as 3:2021cv00437
Plaintiff:
Ruthy Harris
Defendant:
Truist Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Wallace et al v. Truist Bank et al
as 1:2021cv00838
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WALLACE and DMT, LLC
Defendant:
TRUIST FINANCIAL CORPORATION, Eddie R. Hughes, Jr. and Truist Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
