Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Akeem Mason v. J. Booth
as 24-6460
Plaintiff:
AKEEM C. MASON
Defendant:
J. BOOTH, Captain - GTL site supervisor, DEBORAH ALDERSON, CEO, Chairman of GTL and GLOBAL TEL LINK, inmate calling service
Akeem Mason v. Robin Wallace
as 24-6423
Plaintiff:
AKEEM C. MASON
Defendant:
ROBIN WALLACE, Lieutenant, Shift Commander, JOSEPH G. CARR, Lieutenant, Training Shift Commander and CAPTAIN LUCY, Supervisor
Hatcher v. Pocahontas State Correctional Center Investigations Unit
as 7:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Quashawn Akeem Hatcher
Defendant:
Pocahontas State Correctional Center Investigations Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry v. Biagianti et al
as 2:2024cv01127
Plaintiff:
Makandi Leviticus Akeem Terry and Makandi L. Terry
Defendant:
Dorie Biagianti, Bryan A. Alfare and William J. Thrower
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Mason v. Wright et al
as 1:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Akeem C. Mason
Defendant:
B Wright, C Allen and Wesley Townsend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Warden of FCI Edgefield
as 9:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Akeem Jamal Edwards
Defendant:
Warden of FCI Edgefield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Townsend v. Mason, et al.
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Akeem C. Mason
Defendant:
A. Walker and Wesley Townsend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Booth et al
as 1:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Akeem C. Mason
Defendant:
Booth, Wesley Townsend and P. Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Booth et al
as 1:2023cv01673
Plaintiff:
Akeem C. Mason
Defendant:
J. Booth, Deborah Alderson and Global Tel Link Corp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Neville et al
as 2:2023cv00585
Plaintiff:
Akeem C. Mason
Defendant:
N. Neville, Brittany Williams and Robin Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
