Cases 1 - 10 of 99
Paramount Mechanical Corp. v. Coakley & Williams Construction Company et al
as 1:2024cv00763
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the use and benefit of Paramount Mechanical Corporation and Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, LLP
Defendant:
Coakley & Williams Construction Company, Corporation Service Company, Western Surety Company and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3133 Miller Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Justin Longworth v. A. Mansukhani
as 21-7609
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUSTIN M. LONGWORTH
Defendant / Appellee:
A. MANSUKHANI, ANTHONY SCARANTINO, PATRICK BURRELL and others
Porter v. Holland et al
as 5:2019ct03351
Defendant:
Mr. Billingslea, A. Harris, Eric Stephenson and others
Plaintiff:
Leroy Porter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vernon Dowling v. US
as 19-7273
Defendant:
HEALTH SERVICES, DIRECTORS SAMUELS, (FBOP), FBOP DIRECTOR SAMUELS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VERNON BRENT DOWLING
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bruce Winston v. Warden Holland
as 19-7193
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN HOLLAND and WARDEN MANSUKHANI
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRUCE DWAYNE WINSTON
Longworth v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2019ct03199
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, A. Mansukhani and Sherry M. Beck
Plaintiff:
Justin M. Longworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thomas Matherly v. A. Mansukhani
as 19-6643
Petitioner / Appellant:
THOMAS SHANE MATHERLY
Respondent / Appellee:
A. MANSUKHANI
Bodley v. Andrews et al
as 5:2019hc02052
Respondent:
B. Sullivan, Justin Andrews, Warden Mansukhani and others
Petitioner:
Scott Bodley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
