Cases 1 - 10 of 10
United States of America v. Salas-Martinez Personal Property, more specifically described as: A 2009 Pontiac G6 VIN: 1G2ZJ57KX94257542
as 5:2021cv00066
Defendant:
Salas-Martinez Personal Property, more specifically described as: A 2009 Pontiac G6 VIN: 1G2ZJ57KX94257542
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Salas et al v. White et al
as 3:2015cv00122
Defendant:
Gregory L White, James R. White, Jr., Phyllis M. White and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Salas and S&S Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Salas v. USA
as 1:2012cv00361
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Alonso Flores Salas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
MORALES v. GREEN et al
as 1:2010cv00661
Plaintiff:
JESUS SALAS MORALES
Defendant:
MELISSA GREEN and MARTHA PAIR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORALES v. YALE
as 1:2010cv00266
Plaintiff:
JESUS SALAS MORALES
Defendant:
Z.S. YALE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORALES v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC
as 1:2010cv00265
Plaintiff:
JESUS SALAS MORALES
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORALES v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC
as 1:2010cv00181
Plaintiff:
JESUS SALAS MORALES
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORALES v. YALE et al
as 1:2010cv00180
Plaintiff:
JESUS SALAS MORALES
Defendant:
Z. S. YALE and WAYNE JAMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORALES v. YALE et al
as 1:2010cv00148
Plaintiff:
JESUS SALAS MORALES
Defendant:
Z. S. YALE, WAYNE JAMES and CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORALES v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2009cv00824
Plaintiff:
JESUS SALAS MORALES
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
