Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Xi Ying Zheng v. Merrick Garland
as 23-2188
Petitioner: XI YING ZHENG
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Acuitas Therapeutics, Inc. et al v. CureVac SE
as 3:2023cv00764
Plaintiff: Acuitas Therapeutics, Inc., Michael Hope, Ying Tam and others
Defendant: CureVac SE
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 256 Patent Non-Infringement
Acuitas Therapeutics, Inc. et al v. CureVac SE
as 2:2023cv00567
Plaintiff: Acuitas Therapeutics, Inc., Ying Tam, Paulo Lin and others
Defendant: Michael Hope and CureVac SE
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 256 Patent Non-Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00574
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Wong v. House of Shanghai, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00585
Plaintiff: Joyce Y Wong and Yuet-Ying Chan
Defendant: House of Shanghai, Inc. and Sachiko M Yahashi
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Ying Lui v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1343
Petitioner: YING LUI
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1380
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00194
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00647
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Wu et al v. U.S. Bureau of Citizenship & Immigration Services et al
as 1:2021cv00467
Defendant: Gregory Collett, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Bureau of Citizenship & Immigration Services
Plaintiff: Minjiong Wu and Jin Ying
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?