Cases 1 - 10 of 140,692
Ashley et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company et al
as 2:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
James Ashley and Patricia Ashley
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company and The Chemours Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Neal v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Neal, II
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gregg v. Autozone Parts, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Aja Gregg
Defendant:
Autozone Parts, Inc. and Adam Lee Sealey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
J.C. v. St. Mary's Medical Center, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
J. C.
Defendant:
St. Mary's Medical Center, Inc. and Kenneth A. Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Thompson v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Shannon Depaul Thompson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Collins v. Amjad et al
as 5:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Clayton Steven Collins
Defendant:
Dr. Ayne Amjad, Dr. James Beane, Carla Deem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lott v. Ray
as 5:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
Darion D Lott
Respondent:
Warden Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Harper v. Biser et al
as 3:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
Holly R. Harper
Defendant:
Paul Biser, Christopher Dean Chiles, Charles Amos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
