Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Samuel Edward Hiott et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01345
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Edward Hiott, Rick Burnell Hanson, Dominick LaRocca and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Beall et al v. The City of Morgantown
as 1:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Lieutenant Mitchell Beall, Brandon Bailey, Joseph R. Bragg and others
Counter Defendant:
John Borzik, Lieutenant Charles D. Campbell, Michael Close and others
Defendant:
The City of Morgantown
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
US v. Paul Martin, Jr.
as 21-4337
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
PAUL ANTHONY MARTIN, JR.
Fox et al v. Marriott International, Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv00359
Plaintiff:
Norbert Hennrich, Anthony Martin, Samuel Mangano and others
Defendant:
Marriott International, Inc. and Starwood Hotels and Resorts Worldwide, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Martin v. US Bank
as 3:2016cv00297
Plaintiff:
Anthony Martin
Defendant:
US Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Martin et al v. Rushing Creek Development Group, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv00049
Plaintiff:
Anthony Martin and Kim Martin
Defendant:
Rushing Creek Development Group, LLC and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
Martin et al v. Rushing Creek Development Group, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv00010
Plaintiff:
Anthony Martin and Kim Martin
Defendant:
Rushing Creek Development Group, LLC and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
Martin v. Wall Works USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv02708
Plaintiff:
Anthony Martin
Defendant:
Wall Works USA, Inc., Wall Works USA Military Division, Inc., William White and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
