Cases 1 - 10 of 331
Taylor et al v. EQT TGHL Exploration, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Ralph Taylor and Lloyd Baker
Defendant:
EQT TGHL Exploration, LLC and Tug Hill Operating, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Baker v. Lovett
as 3:2024cv00038
Petitioner:
Samuel Baker
Respondent:
Warden Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Baker v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00348
Petitioner:
Beverly Allen Baker
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Harper v. Baker et al
as 2:2023cv00333
Plaintiff:
Kenny Harper
Defendant:
Sgt. Baker, Corporal Riddle and West Virginia Division of Correction and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Doe #1 et al
as 3:2022cv00219
Plaintiff:
Steven Young
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00592
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1991
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Jeffers v. Aldridge et al
as 3:2022cv00268
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Matthew Jeffers
Defendant:
Administrator Carl Aldridge, C.O. Lloyd Irwin, C.O. Pringle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dagostine et al v. Pendleton et al
as 2:2022cv00220
Plaintiff:
Timothy Dagostine and Ramona Dagostine
Defendant:
Mark Pendleton, Baker Tilly US, LLP, Arnett Carbis Toothman LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
