Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Blackmon v. Holder et al
as 5:2023cv00578
Plaintiff:
James Blackmon
Defendant:
James Holder, Andrew Munday and City of Raleigh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ANDERSON v. LEE et al
as 1:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
ALBERT MARQUAVIOUSLAMA ANDERSON and ALBERT MARQUAVIOUSLAMAR ANDERSON
Defendant:
LEE, SALISBURY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, HONEYCUTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luckey v. Jenkins et al
as 3:2022cv00369
Plaintiff:
Melvin Lee Luckey
Defendant:
Glen Jenkins, T.J. Goforth, City of Monroe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LUCKEY v. JENKINS
as 1:2022cv00576
Plaintiff:
MELVIN LEE LUCKEY
Defendant:
DETECTIVE GLEN JENKINS, DETECTIVE LIEUTENANT T.J. GOFORTH, CITY OF MONROE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLACKMON v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv00408
Plaintiff:
ROSE L BLACKMON
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Blackmon et al v. Valley Proteins, Inc.
as 7:2021cv00217
Plaintiff:
FRANK BLACKMON, LINDSEY BLACKMON and Frankie Blackmon
Defendant:
Valley Proteins, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Blackmon v. Holder et al
as 5:2020cv00524
Plaintiff:
James Blackmon
Defendant:
City of Raleigh, James Holder and Andrew Munday
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLACKMON v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2020cv00786
Plaintiff:
SHARON RENEA BLACKMON
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Watkins v. Blackmon et al
as 3:2020cv00460
Defendant:
Marshall Williams, FNU Richardson, Kenneth E Lassiter and others
Plaintiff:
Adrian Dominic Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackmon v. USA
as 7:2019cv00167
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Danny L. Blackmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
