Cases 1 - 10 of 1,225
Richardson-Brown v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00285
Petitioner:
LaTonya Richardson-Brown
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Reza v. United States of America - FBOP et al
as 3:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Matthew Reza
Respondent:
United States of America - FBOP and Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brown v. USA
as 1:2024cv00054
Petitioner:
Lawrence Brown
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Brown v. Jividen et al
as 5:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Anthony Brown
Defendant:
Betsy Jividen, West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Michael Francis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Brown
as 3:2024cv00062
Petitioner:
Derrick A. Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nibert et al v. B&D Dental Equipment Liquidations Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Dallas Nibert, Nika Hettlinger and Crews & Nibert, D.D.S., Inc.
Defendant:
B&D Dental Equipment Liquidations Inc. and Jeffrey W. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Smith v. Brown
as 5:2024cv00072
Petitioner:
Roger Lee Smith
Respondent:
Warden R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Boggs v. Jividen et al
as 5:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Dustin Boggs and Luke Tyler Holstein
Defendant:
Betsy Jividen, Michael Francis, Tiffany Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Brown
as 3:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
Kenneth White
Respondent:
R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
