Cases 1 - 10 of 14
CAPITOL BROADCASTING COMPANY, INCORPORATED et al v. CITY OF SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2022cv01068
Plaintiff:
CAPITOL BROADCASTING COMPANY, INCORPORATED, THE MCCLATCHY COMPANY, LLC D/B/A THE NEWS AND OBSERVER PUBLISHING COMPANY, JAMES S. FARRIN, P.C. D/B/A LAW OFFICES OF JAMES SCOTT FARRIN and others
Defendant:
CITY OF SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA, CITY OF KANNAPOLIS, NORTH CAROLINA, CITY OF RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
RICE v. AUTEN et al
as 1:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
KEVIN AUTEN, JOHN DOE #2, K-9 OFFICER JOHN DOE #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
BOTTOM v. CITY OF SALISBURY et al
as 1:2021cv00322
Defendant:
DEPUTY MARK BENFIELD, OFFICER DEVIN BARKALOW, OFFICER ADAM BOUK and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE BOTTOM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NEUMILLER v. CITY OF SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2019cv00250
Plaintiff:
James Roger Neumiller
Defendant:
CITY OF SALISBURY, NORTH CAROLINA and Lee Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00084
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
SCOTT v. CITY OF SALISBURY
as 1:2018cv00970
Plaintiff:
ALICIA A SCOTT
Defendant:
CITY OF SALISBURY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00954
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GREGORY V. BRUCE, ET AL.
as 1:2015cv00996
Plaintiff:
LISA A. GREGORY
Defendant:
MONTE BRUCE , PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CO. , MARK W. SHUE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUTLER v. CITY OF SALISBURY et al
as 1:2015cv00139
Plaintiff:
YOLANDA BUTLER
Defendant:
CITY OF SALISBURY and CHRISTOPHER S. HAMM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
