Cases 1 - 10 of 97
Sifford v. Drew et al
as 8:2017cv03210
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Sifford
Defendant:
Darlene Drew, Luis Berrios, Julia E Berrios and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sifford v. Drew et al
as 3:2017cv00668
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Sifford
Defendant:
Darlene Drew, Luis Berrios, Julia E. Berrios and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Ekere Inyangette v. Travis Bragg
as 15-6518
Petitioner - Appellant:
EKERE INYANGETTE
Respondent - Appellee:
TRAVIS BRAGG, Warden FCI Bennettsville
Respondent:
DARLENE DREW
Eugene Cunningham v. Darlene Drew
as 14-6040
Petitioner - Appellant:
EUGENE JEROME CUNNINGHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
G. DEL REL, Captain, FCI Bennettesville and DARLENE DREW, Warden, FCI Bennettsville
Defendant:
INMATE WORK COMMITTE, a/k/a Inmate Job Quoatas Assignment Memebers, FCI Bennettesville, T. WHITEHEAD, Acting CMC Case Manager Coordinator, FCI Bennettsville, C. HARDEN, Case Manger, FCI Bennettsville and others
Clarence Fox, Jr. v. Darlene Drew
as 13-7775
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLARENCE T. FOX, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN DARLENE DREW, CARL DOZIER, Trust Fund Supervisor, LUIS BERRIOS, Clinical Director and others
Eugene Cunningham v. Darlene Drew
as 13-7150
Petitioner - Appellant:
EUGENE JEROME CUNNINGHAM
Respondent - Appellee:
DARLENE DREW, Warden - FCI Bennettsville
Corey Riley v. Darlene Drew
as 13-6913
Petitioner - Appellant:
COREY OMAR RILEY
Respondent - Appellee:
DARLENE DREW
Inyangette v. Drew
as 6:2013cv01219
Petitioner:
Ekere Inyangette
Respondent:
Darlene Drew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McDowell v Drew
as 5:2013cv00709
Petitioner:
William McDowell
Respondent:
Darlene Drew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Michael Schulze v. Dwight Ratley
as 12-7771
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL F. SCHULZE and GERARDO GONZALEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
DWIGHT C. RATLEY, SHANNON D. DAVIS, GERALD M. DEL RE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
