Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Jones v. Tabe et al
as 7:2022cv00580
Plaintiff:
Reginald Lamont Jones
Defendant:
WVR Jail, Wellpath's Health Services Director, C/O S. Tabe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drummond v. McDonald et al
as 5:2019cv00685
Plaintiff:
Edward Drummond and Edward Terrick Drummond
Defendant:
Med Tec Amanda, Dr McDonald, Affiant Roy T Dudzic, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Balter v. FBOP Washington, DC et al
as 1:2017cv00768
Plaintiff:
Richard Balter
Defendant:
FBOP Washington, DC, A.W. Richard Engel, Allison Chatman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jeter v. Black et al
as 1:2017cv01453
Plaintiff:
Tony Alvina Jeter
Defendant:
Ebony Black, Christy Barbee, Dr. Mcdonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cogdill v. McDonald et al
as 0:2017cv00502
Plaintiff:
Ronald Floyd Cogdill
Defendant:
Dr McDonald, Christy Barbee, RN Blackwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fitch v. White et al
as 9:2017cv00134
Plaintiff:
Herbert Daniel Fitch
Defendant:
Kathy White, Christy Barbee, Neil Urch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. McDonald et al
as 9:2016cv00861
Plaintiff:
Robert Russell Thompson
Defendant:
Dr McDonald, Nurse White, Chuck Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hubbard v. Spartanburg County Detention Center and/or Medical et al
as 0:2015cv04979
Plaintiff:
Michael Hubbard
Defendant:
Spartanburg County Detention Center and/or Medical, Nurse White, Dr McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drummond v. Spartanburg County et al
as 5:2015cv04285
Plaintiff:
Edward Drummond
Defendant:
Spartanburg County, Neal Urch, Virginia DuPont and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Young et al
as 7:2012cv00233
Plaintiff:
Sandra F. Campbell
Defendant:
Dr. McDonald and Dr. Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
