Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 1 - 10 of 721
MONROE v. ADAMS et al
as 1:2024cv00770
Defendant: JEFFREY R. COOKE, MITCHELL JOHNSON, JAMIE ADAMS and others
Plaintiff: DEVONTA J. MONROE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEDLEY v. USA
as 1:2024cv00726
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: JEFFREY LEON MEDLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Church v. USA
as 5:2024cv00190
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Jeffrey Brent Church
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
VINCE v. REALI et al
as 1:2024cv00639
Defendant: MICHELLE MCMURRY-HEATH, GUIDO J. NEELS, MARY KAY LADONE and others
Plaintiff: JEFFREY VINCE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
MILES v. USA
as 1:2024cv00651
Petitioner: JEFFREY WAYNE MILES
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
VELEZ v. USA
as 1:2024cv00516
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: JEFFREY ALAN VELEZ, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MichJeff, LLC et al v. FCX Global, Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2024cv00449
Plaintiff: MichJeff, LLC and Jeffrey Allan Mueller
Defendant: Pro Therapy Supplies, LLC, FCX Global, Inc, Ten Toes Down, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Pavkovich v. USA
as 5:2024cv00117
Petitioner: Jeffrey Ben Pavkovich
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Pavkovich v. USA
as 5:2024cv00112
Petitioner: Jeffrey Ben Pavkovich
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00223
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?