Cases 1 - 10 of 294
King v. Lieber Correctional Institution
as 0:2024cv03037
Plaintiff:
Eugene King
Defendant:
Lieber Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Kevin Bowlin v. Lieber CI
as 24-6067
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MATTHEW BOWLIN
Defendant:
LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Warden and SCDC
Manuel Marin v. Warden of Lieber Correctional Institution
as 23-6954
Petitioner / Appellant:
MANUEL A. MARIN
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN OF LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Sweat v. State of South Carolina
as 8:2023cv04478
Petitioner:
Paul Harris Sweat
Respondent:
State of South Carolina and Warden of Lieber Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mack v. Stirling
as 9:2023cv03320
Petitioner:
John Willie Mack, Jr
Respondent:
Bryan Stirling and Warden of Lieber Corrrectional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stokes v. Warden Lieber Correctional Institution
as 5:2023cv01594
Petitioner:
Donte Jarod Stokes
Respondent:
Warden Lieber Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tre'Vaughn Jackson v. Brian Kendall
as 23-6262
Petitioner / Appellant:
TRE'VAUGHN JACKSON
Respondent / Appellee:
BRIAN KENDALL, Warden Lieber Correctional Institution
Frazier v. Warden of Lieber
as 5:2023cv00953
Petitioner:
Sharod Frazier
Respondent:
Warden of Lieber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gerrick v. Warden, Lieber Correctional Institution
as 0:2022cv03641
Petitioner:
Sammie Lee Gerrick
Respondent:
Warden, Lieber Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frankie McGee v. Warden of Lieber Correctional Institution
as 22-7148
Petitioner / Appellant:
FRANKIE LEE MCGEE
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN OF LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
