Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Rutledge v. Guess et al
as 0:2022cv02645
Plaintiff:
Montez Rutledge, Montez and Montez L. Rutledge
Defendant:
Travis L. Guess, Allen Rodgers, Lt. Travis L. Guess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
David King v. Timothy Riley
as 22-6410
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID T. KING, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of John Telly King
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN TIMOTHY RILEY, ASSOCIATE WARDEN ANDREA THOMPSON, ASSOCIATE WARDEN GARY LANE and others
Scruggs v. Riley et al
as 0:2020cv01014
Defendant:
Associate Wardeb Gary Lane, Yolanda Captain Brown, Sgt. Dewaun McKan and others
Plaintiff:
Susan Diane Scruggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Pressley et al
as 4:2019cv01818
Defendant:
Lt. Travis Pressley, Ofc. Kevin Harley, Ofc. Tracey Howard and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Riley et al
as 0:2019cv00826
Defendant:
Captain Yolanda Brown, Lt. Tecorrie Garvin, Lt. Travis Pressley and others
Plaintiff:
Lola Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelley v. Riley et al
as 0:2019cv00827
Defendant:
Captain Yolanda Brown, Lt. Tecorrie Garvin, Lt. Travis Pressley and others
Plaintiff:
James H. Kelley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Riley et al
as 0:2019cv00828
Defendant:
Captain Yolanda Brown, Lt. Tecorrie Garvin, Lt. Travis Pressley and others
Plaintiff:
David T. King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shelley v. Stirling et al
as 4:2018cv02259
Defendant:
Ms. Housten, Mr. Marone, Ms. Tribble and others
Plaintiff:
Bronson Shelley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Dilworth v. Captain Adam
as 15-6910
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY DILWORTH
Defendant - Appellee:
CAPTAIN ADAMS, LT. L. ROBINSON, LT. R. JOHNSON and others
Defendant:
ED MCMAHON, Sheriff, New Hanover County, SGT. WHITMORE, OFFICER MARINO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
