Cases 1 - 10 of 150
Williams v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00498
Plaintiff:
Nathan W. Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Johnston v. Hefner et al
as 5:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Johnston
Defendant:
Nathan Hefner, City of Claremont, Victory Builders, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fitch et al v. Tyrrell County Board of Commissioners et al
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Joyce Sykes Fitch, Mark Mixon, Sherryreed Robinson and others
Defendant:
Tyrrell County Board of Commissioners, Nathan Everett, Nina Griswell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Pike v. Libby et al
as 5:2024ct03031
Plaintiff:
Nathan Pike
Defendant:
Officer Tammy Libby, Sgt. William Owens, Officer Cory Lindsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00846
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00651
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jarvis v. Jarvis et al
as 5:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
William T Jarvis
Defendant:
Carolyn Jarvis, Michelle Shook, Robyn Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023hc02209
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
