Cases 1 - 10 of 111
Hager et al v. Jividen et al
as 5:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Douglas Hager and Adam Lee Suratt
Defendant:
Betsy Jividen, Michael Francis, Tiffany Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Shrewsbury et al
as 2:2023cv00543
Plaintiff:
Nathan Nelson
Defendant:
Aaron Shrewsbury and City of Mount Hope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mott v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Nathan Mott
Defendant:
Warden John Doe, Assistant Warden John Doe, Mr. Blanks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mott v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Mr. Nathan Mott and Carl Lynch
Defendant:
John Doe, Mr. Blanks, Knotts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mott v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
Mr. Nathan Mott and Carl Lynch
Defendant:
Warden John Doe, Assistant Warden John Doe, Mr. Blanks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00380
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Daniels v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00162
Petitioner:
Nathan Daniels
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith v. Weaver
as 3:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Nathan Wayne Smith
Defendant:
RN Weaver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Barnett et al v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA.
as 3:2023cv00193
Plaintiff:
Nathan Barnett and Philip Barnett
Defendant:
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Hensley v. Brown
as 3:2022cv00178
Petitioner:
Robert Nathan Hensley
Respondent:
S. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
