Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
United States of America v. Chemtronics, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00272
Defendant:
Northrop Grumman Systems Corp. and Chemtronics, Inc.
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
General Tool Company v. Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation
as 1:2020cv00734
Plaintiff:
General Tool Company
Defendant:
Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KST Data, Inc. v. Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation
as 1:2018cv01329
Defendant:
Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation
Plaintiff:
KST Data, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crisell Seguin v. US Department of Labor
as 18-1414
Petitioner:
CRISELL SEGUIN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD and NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION
Northrop Grumman Systems Corp. v. US Department of Labor
as 17-2204
Petitioner:
NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD
:
Northrop Grumman Systems Corp. v. US Department of Labor
as 17-1811
Petitioner:
NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD
:
United States of America v. CTS Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv00380
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
CTS Corporation, Mills Gap Road Associates and Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
Grabowski v. Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation
as 1:2016cv03492
Plaintiff:
Conrad Grabowski
Defendant:
Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
