Cases 1 - 10 of 281
Mooney v. Logan County Commission
as 2:2024cv00304
Plaintiff:
Randall Todd Mooney
Defendant:
Logan County Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stebbins v. USA
as 1:2024cv00034
Petitioner:
Randall Richard Stebbins
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Breech et al v. Ergon Trucking, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Deborah Breech and Audrey E. Grooms
Defendant:
Ergon Trucking, Inc. and Bruce Randall Stack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Martin v. Ray
as 5:2024cv00018
Petitioner:
Randall Cedis Martin
Respondent:
H. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McGranahan v. City of Hurricane et al
as 3:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Joseph McGranahan
Defendant:
City of Hurricane, Sergeant Poe, Officer Randall Justin Rakes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
Randall C. Martin
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sheppheard et al v. Justice et al
as 5:2023cv00530
Plaintiff:
Thomas Sheppheard, Tyler Randall, Adam Perry and others
Defendant:
James C. Justice, Jr. and Mark Sorsaia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keystone v. USA
as 3:2023cv00096
Petitioner:
Randall Keystone
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Patrick v. Heckard
as 5:2023cv00234
Petitioner:
Steven Randall Patrick
Respondent:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Patrick v. Heckard
as 5:2023cv00232
Petitioner:
Steven Randall Patrick
Defendant:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
