Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Alderman v. Caleb Pearson Team LLC, The et al
as 2:2019cv00744
Defendant:
Hank Johnson, Caleb Pearson, Re-Max LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew W Alderman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
RE/MAX,LLC v. AMERICAN PROPERTY SERVICES CO. et al
as 1:2016cv01433
Plaintiff:
RE/MAX, LLC
Defendant:
AMERICAN PROPERTY SERVICES CO. and DONEIL CROOM
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
RE/MAX, LLC v. M.L. Jones & Associates, Ltd et al
as 5:2012cv00768
Plaintiff:
RE/MAX, LLC
Defendant:
M.L. Jones & Associates, Ltd and Matthew L. Jones
Counter_claimant:
Matthew L. Jones and M.L. Jones & Associates, Ltd
Counter_defendant:
RE/MAX, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
RE/MAX, LLC v. M.L. Jones & Associates, Ltd et al
as 4:2012cv00279
Plaintiff:
RE/MAX, LLC
Defendant:
M.L. Jones & Associates, Ltd and Matthew L. Jones
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
RE/MAX, LLC v. McCroskey et al
as 1:2012cv03290
Plaintiff:
RE/MAX, LLC
Defendant:
Melita McCroskey, Karen Chandler and McCroskey & Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
RE/MAX, LLC v. Southside Realty, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00499
Plaintiff:
RE/MAX, LLC
Defendant:
Southside Realty, Inc., Peter Janson and Daniel Lewis Jones
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
RE/MAX, LLC v. Shelor et al
as 4:2011cv00223
Plaintiff:
RE/MAX, LLC
Defendant:
Alan Shelor and Alan Shelor Real Estate, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
RE/MAX, LLC v. Rolling Hills Realty, Inc et al
as 1:2011cv00151
Defendant:
Rolling Hills Realty, Inc , Scott Walker , David Brackett and others
Plaintiff:
RE/MAX, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
RE/MAX, LLC v. Sensational Realty, Inc. et al
as 5:2010cv00483
Plaintiff:
RE/MAX, LLC
Defendant:
Sensational Realty, Inc. and Glen A. Frederich
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
RE/MAX, LLC v. Underwood et al
as 1:2010cv02367
Plaintiff:
RE/MAX, LLC
Defendant:
Jeff Underwood and Uncommon Homes, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
