Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Davis v. Justice et al
as 2:2018cv01316
Defendant:
Jill Upson, Tom Takubo, Charles H. Clements and others
Plaintiff:
Robin Jean Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rowan v. Extendicare, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00114
Plaintiff:
Lois Rowan
Defendant:
Extendicare, Inc., Extendicare Health Services, Inc. , Kaufman Street WV, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rowan et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv14039
Plaintiff:
Joy Rowan and David Rowan
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rowan v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv10136
Plaintiff:
Lois Rowan
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rowan v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv09035
Plaintiff:
Tammy Lynn Rowan
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rowan et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02822
Plaintiff:
Tammy L. Rowan and Duane Rowan
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rowan et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00216
Plaintiff:
Rochelle M. Rowan and Bernard F. Rowan
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rowan et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv12550
Plaintiff:
Frances Rowan and Donald A. Rowan
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Detamore v. Nabors Completion & Production Co. et al
as 1:2013cv00121
Plaintiff:
Ashley Detamore
Defendant:
Nabors Completion & Production Co. and Forrest J. Rowan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rowan v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv08045
Plaintiff:
Kathleen F. Rowan
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
