Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Ray v. Koppel et al
as 8:2013cv03480
Plaintiff:
Dustin Ray
Defendant:
Robert Koppel, Secretary of the Department of Corrections, State Fire Marshal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Shawn Corpening v. Alvin Keller
as 12-6343
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHAWN DUPREE CORPENING
Respondent - Appellee:
ALVIN KELLER, Secretary of the Department of Corrections
William Mustafa v. Theodis Beck
as 09-7234
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM ABDULLAH MUSTAFA
Respondent - Appellee:
THEODIS BECK, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Corrections
Michael McNeill v. Theodis Beck
as 08-7626
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL MCNEILL
Respondent - Appellee:
THEODIS BECK, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Correction
Wayne Wilkerson v. Theodis Beck
as 08-7128
Petitioner - Appellant:
WAYNE ELLIOTT WILKERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
THEODIS BECK, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Correction
John Carpenter v. Theodis Beck
as 07-7687
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN PHILMORE CARPENTER
Respondent - Appellee:
THEODIS BECK, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Correction
Bobby Ledbetter v. Theodis Beck
as 07-7643
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BOBBY E. LEDBETTER
Defendant - Appellee:
THEODIS BECK, Secretary North Carolina Department of Corrections, TERRY HARVEL, Superintendent, PAMALA LOVE, Doctor and others
Smith v. Beck
as 07-7455
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT WAYNE SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
THEODIS BECK, Secretary of the Department of Corrections
Berrow v. Beck
as 07-7287
Petitioner - Appellant:
MELVIN DOUGLAS BERROW
Respondent - Appellee:
THEODIS BECK, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Corrections
Cagle v. Branker
as 07-6
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD EUGENE CAGLE
Respondent - Appellee:
MARVIN L. POLK, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina, THEODIS BECK, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Corrections and GERALD J. BRANKER, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.